C (A Child), Re [2012] EWCA Civ 1144 (11 July 2012)
The appeal is allowed to the extent that the return order is set aside, but the case is remitted for a full hearing in the Family Division because the outcome is not so obvious as to render remission futile; the child's welfare and wishes require proper judicial determination.
- Citation
- [2012] EWCA Civ 1144
- Parties
- Appellant Child: Nicole (C, a child); First Respondent: Father; Second Respondent: Mother; Third Respondent: Guardian (Cafcass)
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 11 July 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal From Family Division (hague Convention 1980 Child Return Proceedings) / Appeal Judgment; Remittal for Rehearing
- Outcome
- Return order set aside; case remitted to Family Division for rehearing.
- Legal Topics
- Hague Convention 1980, Child Return Orders, Wishes and Feelings of the Child, Discretion in Child Abduction Cases
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Nicole (C, a child)
Appellant Child
Father
First Respondent
Mother
Second Respondent
Guardian (Cafcass)
Third Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal From Family Division (hague Convention 1980 Child Return Proceedings) / Appeal Judgment; Remittal for Rehearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the return order for the child under the Hague Convention should be set aside
- 2 Whether the case should be remitted for rehearing or the father's application dismissed outright
- 3 How the child's wishes and welfare should be weighed in the context of international abduction proceedings
Ratio Decidendi
The appeal is allowed to the extent that the return order is set aside, but the case is remitted for a full hearing in the Family Division because the outcome is not so obvious as to render remission futile; the child's welfare and wishes require proper judicial determination.
Court Disposition
Return order set aside; case remitted to Family Division for rehearing.
Orders
- Case remitted to Family Division for urgent rehearing before Roderic Wood J if possible, otherwise another judge as soon as possible.
- Judicial availability to take priority in listing the case.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment