Thomas v News Group Newspapers Ltd & Anor [2001] EWCA Civ 1233 (18 July 2001)
A series of press publications can, in rare and exceptional circumstances, amount to harassment under the Protection from Harassment Act 1997, particularly where the publications are racist and foreseeably provoke hostility and distress against an individual. The claimant's pleading disclosed an arguable case that the defendants' conduct was oppressive, unreasonable, and not protected by Article 10 ECHR. The appeal to strike out the claim was therefore dismissed.
- Citation
- [2001] EWCA Civ 1233
- Parties
- Claimant/respondent: Esther Thomas; Defendant/appellant: News Group Newspapers Limited; Defendant/appellant: Simon Hughes
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 18 July 2001
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From Lambeth County Court to Court of Appeal (civil Division)
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Harassment, Freedom of Expression, Protection From Harassment Act 1997, Article 10 ECHR, Journalistic Conduct
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Esther Thomas
Claimant/respondent
News Group Newspapers Limited
Defendant/appellant
Simon Hughes
Defendant/appellant
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From Lambeth County Court to Court of Appeal (civil Division)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a series of newspaper articles can constitute harassment under the Protection from Harassment Act 1997
- 2 Whether the publications in question were racist and intended to provoke hostility against the claimant on grounds of race
- 3 How Article 10 ECHR (freedom of expression) interacts with the 1997 Act in the context of press publications
Ratio Decidendi
A series of press publications can, in rare and exceptional circumstances, amount to harassment under the Protection from Harassment Act 1997, particularly where the publications are racist and foreseeably provoke hostility and distress against an individual. The claimant's pleading disclosed an arguable case that the defendants' conduct was oppressive, unreasonable, and not protected by Article 10 ECHR. The appeal to strike out the claim was therefore dismissed.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Appeal dismissed with costs to be subject to detailed assessment.
- Case transferred to the High Court with an undertaking that, if successful, the defendants will not seek to recover more costs than they would be entitled to recover had the matter proceeded in the County Court.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment