Singh v Bhakar & Ors [2006] EW Misc 1 (EWCC) (24 July 2006)

Singh v Bhakar & Ors [2006] EW Misc 1 (EWCC) (24 July 2006)

The court found that the Second Defendant engaged in a deliberate and sustained campaign of harassment against the Claimant, including coercion to cut her hair, excessive and demeaning housework, isolation, and restriction of communication, which caused the Claimant to suffer a moderate depressive episode. The conduct satisfied the requirements of the Protection from Harassment Act 1997, and the Claimant was entitled to damages, including aggravated damages, for the psychiatric injury and distress suffered.

Citation
[2006] EW Misc 1 (EWCC)
Parties
Claimant: Gina Satvir Singh; First Defendant: Prithvipal Singh Bhakar; Second Defendant: Dalbir Kaur Bhakar
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
24 July 2006
Procedural Posture
Civil Claim for Damages Under the Protection From Harassment Act 1997 / Judgment After Trial
Outcome
Judgment for the Claimant against the Second Defendant for harassment under the Protection from Harassment Act 1997.
Legal Topics
Harassment, Damages, Domestic Abuse, Protection From Harassment Act 1997
Tort Law Family Law Harassment Damages Domestic Abuse Protection From Harassment Act 1997

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Gina Satvir Singh

Claimant

Prithvipal Singh Bhakar

First Defendant

Dalbir Kaur Bhakar

Second Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil Claim for Damages Under the Protection From Harassment Act 1997 / Judgment After Trial

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the conduct of the Second Defendant amounted to harassment under the Protection from Harassment Act 1997
  2. 2 Whether the Claimant suffered psychiatric injury as a result of the harassment
  3. 3 Whether aggravated damages should be awarded

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the Second Defendant engaged in a deliberate and sustained campaign of harassment against the Claimant, including coercion to cut her hair, excessive and demeaning housework, isolation, and restriction of communication, which caused the Claimant to suffer a moderate depressive episode. The conduct satisfied the requirements of the Protection from Harassment Act 1997, and the Claimant was entitled to damages, including aggravated damages, for the psychiatric injury and distress suffered.

Court Disposition

Judgment for the Claimant against the Second Defendant for harassment under the Protection from Harassment Act 1997.

Orders

  • The Second Defendant is ordered to pay damages to the Claimant, including aggravated damages.