Conn v City of Sunderland [2007] EWCA Civ 1492 (07 November 2007)
The conduct in the first incident did not cross the threshold into criminal harassment as required by the Act, and thus there were not two incidents sufficient to constitute a 'course of conduct'; the recorder erred in law by not applying the correct threshold. The appeal was allowed and the claim dismissed.
- Citation
- [2007] EWCA Civ 1492
- Parties
- Respondent/claimant: Conn; Appellant/defendant: The Council of the City of Sunderland
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 07 November 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From County Court Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; claim dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Harassment, Vicarious Liability, Damages, Protection From Harassment Act 1997
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Conn
Respondent/claimant
The Council of the City of Sunderland
Appellant/defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From County Court Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the conduct of Mr Dryden amounted to harassment under the Protection from Harassment Act 1997
- 2 Whether the incidents constituted a 'course of conduct' sufficient for liability
- 3 Whether the employer was vicariously liable for the conduct
Ratio Decidendi
The conduct in the first incident did not cross the threshold into criminal harassment as required by the Act, and thus there were not two incidents sufficient to constitute a 'course of conduct'; the recorder erred in law by not applying the correct threshold. The appeal was allowed and the claim dismissed.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; claim dismissed
Orders
- Appeal allowed
- Recorder's order set aside
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment