Roberts v Bank of Scotland Plc (Rev 1) [2013] EWCA Civ 882 (11 June 2013)
The bank's repeated and intimidatory telephone calls, despite the claimant's clear requests to desist, constituted harassment under the Protection from Harassment Act 1997. The context, frequency, and content of the calls crossed the threshold from mere annoyance to unlawful harassment. The award of £7,500 in damages was appropriate, falling within the middle Vento band for injury to feelings.
- Citation
- [2013] EWCA Civ 882
- Parties
- Claimant/respondent: Amanda Roberts; Defendant/appellant: Bank of Scotland Plc
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 11 June 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From County Court to Court of Appeal
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Harassment, Damages, Protection From Harassment Act 1997, Banking Practices, Quantum of Damages
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Amanda Roberts
Claimant/respondent
Bank of Scotland Plc
Defendant/appellant
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From County Court to Court of Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the bank's repeated telephone calls constituted harassment under the Protection from Harassment Act 1997
- 2 Whether the quantum of damages awarded was appropriate
Ratio Decidendi
The bank's repeated and intimidatory telephone calls, despite the claimant's clear requests to desist, constituted harassment under the Protection from Harassment Act 1997. The context, frequency, and content of the calls crossed the threshold from mere annoyance to unlawful harassment. The award of £7,500 in damages was appropriate, falling within the middle Vento band for injury to feelings.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- The appeal by Bank of Scotland Plc is dismissed on all grounds.
- The award of £7,500 in damages to the claimant stands.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment