Yamba v Bw Legal Services Ltd [2025] EWCA Civ 1299 (13 October 2025)

Yamba v Bw Legal Services Ltd [2025] EWCA Civ 1299 (13 October 2025)

The case management order permitting amendment of pleadings before the substantive appeal did not foreclose arguments or turn the appeal into a rehearing. The order allowed the appellate court to consider the harassment claim as clearly pleaded, without insulating the claimant from the need to succeed on the merits. The facts pleaded were sufficient to allow reliance on common law harassment, and the order was within the court's case management powers.

Citation
[2025] EWCA Civ 1299
Parties
Claimant/respondent: Jackson Yamba; Defendant/appellant: BW Legal Services Limited
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
13 October 2025
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court (king's Bench Division) to Court of Appeal
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Harassment, Malicious Prosecution, Abuse of Process, Case Management, Pleadings, Strike Out Applications
Civil Procedure Tort Harassment Malicious Prosecution Abuse of Process Case Management Pleadings Strike Out Applications

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Jackson Yamba

Claimant/respondent

BW Legal Services Limited

Defendant/appellant

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court (king's Bench Division) to Court of Appeal

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the High Court erred in granting permission to amend pleadings before the substantive appeal on a strike out application for harassment.
  2. 2 Whether a Reply can sufficiently raise a new claim of common law harassment.

Ratio Decidendi

The case management order permitting amendment of pleadings before the substantive appeal did not foreclose arguments or turn the appeal into a rehearing. The order allowed the appellate court to consider the harassment claim as clearly pleaded, without insulating the claimant from the need to succeed on the merits. The facts pleaded were sufficient to allow reliance on common law harassment, and the order was within the court's case management powers.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • The appeal by BW Legal Services Limited is dismissed.
  • The case management orders permitting amendment of pleadings before the substantive appeal stand.