Ting Lan Hong & KLM (A Child) v XYZ & Ors

Ting Lan Hong & KLM (A Child) v XYZ & Ors

The evidence established a course of conduct by the defendants that amounted to harassment under the Protection from Harassment Act 1997, causing distress and alarm to the claimants. The court found it necessary and proportionate to grant the injunction to restrain further harassment.

Parties
First Claimant: Ting Lan Hong; Second Claimant: Child 'KLM'; Defendants: XYZ and others
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
18 November 2011
Procedural Posture
Civil / Ex Parte Application for Interim Injunction
Outcome
Injunction granted
Legal Topics
Harassment, Injunctions, Privacy
Tort Civil Procedure Harassment Injunctions Privacy

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Ting Lan Hong

First Claimant

Child 'KLM'

Second Claimant

XYZ and others

Defendants

Procedural Posture

Civil / Ex Parte Application for Interim Injunction

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the conduct of the defendants amounted to harassment under the Protection from Harassment Act 1997
  2. 2 Whether an injunction should be granted to restrain further harassment

Ratio Decidendi

The evidence established a course of conduct by the defendants that amounted to harassment under the Protection from Harassment Act 1997, causing distress and alarm to the claimants. The court found it necessary and proportionate to grant the injunction to restrain further harassment.

Court Disposition

Injunction granted

Orders

  • Defendants are prohibited from harassing the claimants pursuant to the Protection from Harassment Act 1997