King v Department of the Environment, Transport & the Regions [2003] EWCA Civ 730 (23 May 2003)

King v Department of the Environment, Transport & the Regions [2003] EWCA Civ 730 (23 May 2003)

The Court of Appeal held that the sole cause of the accident was the claimant's lack of attention, not any negligence in the design or construction of the roundabout. The defendant had provided ample warning and signage, and the entry angle, though above recommended, was not causative. The trial judge erred in attributing causation to the design. The appeal was allowed and the High Court judgment set aside.

Citation
[2003] EWCA Civ 730
Parties
Claimant / Respondent: Tommy Francis King; Defendant / Appellant: Department of the Environment, Transport & the Regions
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
23 May 2003
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court Judgment
Outcome
Appeal allowed; High Court judgment set aside
Legal Topics
Highway Authority Liability, Negligence, Contributory Negligence, Road Traffic Accident, Standard of Care in Road Design
Tort Personal Injury Administrative Law Highway Authority Liability Negligence Contributory Negligence Road Traffic Accident Standard of Care in Road Design

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Tommy Francis King

Claimant / Respondent

Department of the Environment, Transport & the Regions

Defendant / Appellant

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the design and construction of the Cobtree roundabout was negligent and caused the claimant's accident
  2. 2 Whether the claimant's own negligence was the sole or contributory cause of the accident
  3. 3 Whether the trial judge erred in finding liability against the defendant

Ratio Decidendi

The Court of Appeal held that the sole cause of the accident was the claimant's lack of attention, not any negligence in the design or construction of the roundabout. The defendant had provided ample warning and signage, and the entry angle, though above recommended, was not causative. The trial judge erred in attributing causation to the design. The appeal was allowed and the High Court judgment set aside.

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed; High Court judgment set aside

Orders

  • Appellant to pay respondent's costs, to be assessed by a costs judge