Sebastian Braithwaite v London Borough of Lewisham

Sebastian Braithwaite v London Borough of Lewisham

The build-out did not constitute a real source of danger or trap for reasonably careful or less careful motorcyclists; the accident was caused by the claimant's excessive speed and inattention. The authority complied with its duty and regulatory requirements, and no breach of section 41 was established. Post-accident changes do not evidence prior breach.

Parties
Claimant/appellant: Sebastian Braithwaite; Defendant/respondent: London Borough of Lewisham
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
04 February 2025
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment on Appeal
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Highway Authority Liability, Negligence, Duty of Care, Section 41 Highways Act 1980, Traffic Calming Measures, Contributory Negligence
Tort Personal Injury Administrative Law Highway Authority Liability Negligence Duty of Care Section 41 Highways Act 1980 Traffic Calming Measures +1 more

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 8 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 6
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Sebastian Braithwaite

Claimant/appellant

London Borough of Lewisham

Defendant/respondent

Procedural Posture

Appeal / Judgment on Appeal

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the build-out constituted a dangerous hazard or trap for motorcyclists at night
  2. 2 Whether the highway authority breached its duty under section 41 of the Highways Act 1980
  3. 3 Whether the authority owed a duty to less than careful road users

Ratio Decidendi

The build-out did not constitute a real source of danger or trap for reasonably careful or less careful motorcyclists; the accident was caused by the claimant's excessive speed and inattention. The authority complied with its duty and regulatory requirements, and no breach of section 41 was established. Post-accident changes do not evidence prior breach.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed