Walsh v The Council of the Borough of Kirklees [2019] EWHC 492 (QB) (05 March 2019)
The trial judge was entitled to find that there was not enough reliable evidence of the pothole's dimensions or condition to conclude it was more likely than not a real source of danger; there was no error of law or fact justifying appellate intervention.
- Citation
- [2019] EWHC 492 (QB)
- Parties
- Claimant and Appellant: Miranda Walsh; Defendant and Respondent: The Council of the Borough of Kirklees
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 05 March 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From County Court Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Highway Maintenance Liability, Statutory Duty, Personal Injury, Burden of Proof, Appellate Review of Fact Finding
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Miranda Walsh
Claimant and Appellant
The Council of the Borough of Kirklees
Defendant and Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From County Court Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the trial judge erred in finding insufficient evidence of the pothole's dimensions and dangerousness under section 41 of the Highways Act 1980
- 2 Whether the appellate court should overturn the trial judge's findings of fact
Ratio Decidendi
The trial judge was entitled to find that there was not enough reliable evidence of the pothole's dimensions or condition to conclude it was more likely than not a real source of danger; there was no error of law or fact justifying appellate intervention.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment