Young, R (On the Application Of) v Governor of Her Majesty's Prison Highdown Secretary of State for Justice
The HDC policy was lawfully applied; it is not discriminatory or irrational, and does not violate ECHR Articles 8 or 14. The procedure followed was fair, and no comparator group exists to support the discrimination claim.
- Parties
- Claimant: Joseph Young; First Defendant: Governor of Her Majesty’s Prison Highdown; Second Defendant: Secretary of State for Justice
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 06 April 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Claim dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Home Detention Curfew, Prisoner Release Policy, Judicial Review, Discrimination, Procedural Fairness, ECHR Article 8, ECHR Article 14
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Joseph Young
Claimant
Governor of Her Majesty’s Prison Highdown
First Defendant
Secretary of State for Justice
Second Defendant
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Home Detention Curfew (HDC) policy was applied lawfully to the claimant
- 2 Whether the policy is discriminatory, irrational, or in violation of ECHR Articles 8 and 14
- 3 Whether the procedure followed was fair, including the absence of an oral hearing
Ratio Decidendi
The HDC policy was lawfully applied; it is not discriminatory or irrational, and does not violate ECHR Articles 8 or 14. The procedure followed was fair, and no comparator group exists to support the discrimination claim.
Court Disposition
Claim dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment