IN v CH [2024] EWFC 233 (08 July 2024)

IN v CH [2024] EWFC 233 (08 July 2024)

The Wife does not have a beneficial interest in the matrimonial home. Her evidence and prior statements undermine her claim, and the documentation shows she was aware of the ownership structure. The Husband is entitled to seek termination of her Home Rights under s.33(3)(e) Family Law Act 1996, subject to provision of alternative accommodation. The court cannot order the sale of the yacht as it is legally owned by AB Limited, a third party not joined to the proceedings. The proceeds of sale of the matrimonial home are to be held in escrow, with provision for the Wife's rent, deposit, staff, and bills. The Wife and children may remain in occupation until completion of sale.

Citation
[2024] EWFC 233
Parties
Applicant Husband: IN; Respondent Wife: CH
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
08 July 2024
Procedural Posture
Family Law Cross Applications (home Rights Termination and Sale of Chattel) / Post Interim Applications, Pre Fdr, Judgment on Cross Applications
Outcome
Husband's application to terminate Wife's Home Rights granted subject to conditions; Wife's application for conduct of sale of yacht refused.
Legal Topics
Home Rights, Beneficial Interest, Constructive Trust, Proprietary Estoppel, Sale of Matrimonial Assets, Maintenance Pending Suit, Escrow Arrangements
Family Law Property Law Home Rights Beneficial Interest Constructive Trust Proprietary Estoppel Sale of Matrimonial Assets Maintenance Pending Suit +1 more

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 11 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 12
Sign in to unlock

Parties

IN

Applicant Husband

CH

Respondent Wife

Procedural Posture

Family Law Cross Applications (home Rights Termination and Sale of Chattel) / Post Interim Applications, Pre Fdr, Judgment on Cross Applications

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the Wife has a beneficial interest in the matrimonial home
  2. 2 Whether the Husband can terminate the Wife's Home Rights under s.33(3)(e) Family Law Act 1996
  3. 3 Whether the court can order the sale of the yacht under the Married Women's Property Act 1882 or FPR 2010 r.20.2(1)(c)(v)

Ratio Decidendi

The Wife does not have a beneficial interest in the matrimonial home. Her evidence and prior statements undermine her claim, and the documentation shows she was aware of the ownership structure. The Husband is entitled to seek termination of her Home Rights under s.33(3)(e) Family Law Act 1996, subject to provision of alternative accommodation. The court cannot order the sale of the yacht as it is legally owned by AB Limited, a third party not joined to the proceedings. The proceeds of sale of the matrimonial home are to be held in escrow, with provision for the Wife's rent, deposit, staff, and bills. The Wife and children may remain in occupation until completion of sale.

Court Disposition

Husband's application to terminate Wife's Home Rights granted subject to conditions; Wife's application for conduct of sale of yacht refused.

Orders

  • The matrimonial home is to be marketed for sale and, if an appropriate sale is forthcoming, sold.
  • The Wife and children may remain in occupation until completion of sale or agreed prior move to rental accommodation.