Hemley v Croydon Council [2015] EWCA Civ 1519 (19 November 2015)
Permission to appeal is granted because it is strongly arguable that Judge Faber erred in law by substituting her own view for that of the reviewing officer and by failing to consider whether the reviewing officer's decision was reasonable, rather than focusing on technical errors in language.
- Citation
- [2015] EWCA Civ 1519
- Parties
- Claimant/respondent: Ms Faharri Rose Hemley; Defendant/appellant: Croydon Council
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 19 November 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Application for Permission to Appeal (second Appeal)
- Outcome
- Permission to appeal granted
- Legal Topics
- Homelessness, Priority Need, Judicial Review, Errors of Law, Section 202 and 204 Housing Act 1996
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Ms Faharri Rose Hemley
Claimant/respondent
Croydon Council
Defendant/appellant
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Application for Permission to Appeal (second Appeal)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the reviewing officer made material errors of fact amounting to errors of law in the homelessness priority need decision
- 2 Whether Judge Faber substituted her own view for that of the reviewing officer and failed to apply the correct standard of review
Ratio Decidendi
Permission to appeal is granted because it is strongly arguable that Judge Faber erred in law by substituting her own view for that of the reviewing officer and by failing to consider whether the reviewing officer's decision was reasonable, rather than focusing on technical errors in language.
Court Disposition
Permission to appeal granted
Orders
- Permission to appeal against Judge Faber's order is granted
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment