Ryde v London Borough of Enfield
The authority's failure to notify under regulation 8(2) did not cause prejudice to the applicant, and the authority's decision, including the handling of medical evidence, was not Wednesbury unreasonable. No important point of principle or compelling reason justified a second appeal.
- Parties
- Claimant/applicant: John Ryde; Defendant/respondent: London Borough of Enfield
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 13 October 2005
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Renewed Application for Permission to Appeal (second Appeal)
- Outcome
- Permission to appeal refused
- Legal Topics
- Homelessness, Judicial Review, Procedural Fairness, Legal Aid
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
John Ryde
Claimant/applicant
London Borough of Enfield
Defendant/respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Renewed Application for Permission to Appeal (second Appeal)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the local authority failed to comply with regulation 8(2) of the Allocation of Housing and Homelessness (Review Procedures) Regulations 1999
- 2 Whether the authority erred in not referring new medical evidence to a medical officer before making a review decision
- 3 Whether the authority's decision was Wednesbury unreasonable
Ratio Decidendi
The authority's failure to notify under regulation 8(2) did not cause prejudice to the applicant, and the authority's decision, including the handling of medical evidence, was not Wednesbury unreasonable. No important point of principle or compelling reason justified a second appeal.
Court Disposition
Permission to appeal refused
Orders
- Application for permission to appeal refused with costs
- Order made under section 11 of the Access to Justice Act
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment