Robinson v Secretary of State for Communities And Local Government & Ors [2016] EWHC 634 (QB) (22 January 2016)
The Inspector's failure to consider the updated housing land supply figures did not amount to procedural unfairness because the new figures were not uncontentious or objectively verifiable facts. The Inspector erred in law by failing to consider the weight to be given to out-of-date development plan policies, but this error was immaterial as it would not have affected the outcome. The Inspector did not err in his treatment of the Site as a valued community facility or open space, as there were no formal arrangements for public use and the weight attached was a matter for the Inspector's judgment.
- Citation
- [2016] EWHC 634
- Parties
- Claimant: Barbara Robinson; First Defendant: Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government; Second Defendant: Suffolk Coastal District Council; Interested Party: Withers Trust Corporation Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 22 January 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Section 288 Town and Country Planning Act 1990 Statutory Challenge / High Court Judgment
- Outcome
- Claim dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Housing Land Supply, Development Plan Policies, National Planning Policy Framework (nppf), Procedural Fairness, Material Considerations, Community Facilities, Open Space, Statutory Interpretation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Barbara Robinson
Claimant
Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government
First Defendant
Suffolk Coastal District Council
Second Defendant
Withers Trust Corporation Limited
Interested Party
Procedural Posture
Section 288 Town and Country Planning Act 1990 Statutory Challenge / High Court Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the decision was procedurally unfair due to failure to provide updated housing land supply figures
- 2 Whether the Inspector failed to properly apply statutory requirements regarding the development plan
- 3 Whether the Inspector failed to have regard to relevant policy on valued community facilities and open space under the NPPF
Ratio Decidendi
The Inspector's failure to consider the updated housing land supply figures did not amount to procedural unfairness because the new figures were not uncontentious or objectively verifiable facts. The Inspector erred in law by failing to consider the weight to be given to out-of-date development plan policies, but this error was immaterial as it would not have affected the outcome. The Inspector did not err in his treatment of the Site as a valued community facility or open space, as there were no formal arrangements for public use and the weight attached was a matter for the Inspector's judgment.
Court Disposition
Claim dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment