Oadby And Wigston Borough Council v Secretary of State for Communities And Local Government & Anor [2015] EWHC 1879 (Admin) (03 July 2015)
The Inspector was entitled, as a matter of planning judgment, to adopt 147 dwellings per annum as the full objectively assessed need for housing (FOAN) for the purposes of assessing whether the Council could demonstrate a five-year housing land supply. The Inspector did not err in law, irrationally adopt a flawed scenario, or fail to give adequate reasons. The claim is dismissed.
- Citation
- [2015] EWHC 1879 (Admin)
- Parties
- Claimant: Oadby and Wigston Borough Council; First Defendant: Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government; Second Defendant: Bloor Homes Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 03 July 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review (statutory Application Under Section 288 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990) / High Court Judgment
- Outcome
- Claim dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Housing Land Supply, Objective Assessment of Housing Need (foan), Affordable Housing, Development Plan Policies, National Planning Policy Framework (nppf), Judicial Review of Planning Decisions
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Oadby and Wigston Borough Council
Claimant
Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government
First Defendant
Bloor Homes Limited
Second Defendant
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review (statutory Application Under Section 288 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990) / High Court Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Inspector erred in law in his assessment of the full objectively assessed need for housing (FOAN) for Oadby & Wigston Borough Council for the purposes of demonstrating a five-year housing land supply
- 2 Whether the Inspector failed to have regard to material evidence or gave inadequate reasons for his decision
- 3 Whether the Inspector misconstrued the requirements of the NPPF regarding FOAN and affordable housing
Ratio Decidendi
The Inspector was entitled, as a matter of planning judgment, to adopt 147 dwellings per annum as the full objectively assessed need for housing (FOAN) for the purposes of assessing whether the Council could demonstrate a five-year housing land supply. The Inspector did not err in law, irrationally adopt a flawed scenario, or fail to give adequate reasons. The claim is dismissed.
Court Disposition
Claim dismissed
Orders
- Application to quash the Inspector's decision is refused
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment