Shropshire Council v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government & Anor [2016] EWHC 2733 (Admin) (02 November 2016)
The Inspector erred in law by failing to make a judgment on Shropshire Council's current FOAN or housing requirements and its housing supply, as required by NPPF 47, 49, and 14, based on the evidence before him. He was required to do the best he could with available material, and if unable to do so, to provide adequate reasons. The failure to make these judgments was a critical flaw in the decision-making process, warranting quashing of the planning permission.
- Citation
- [2016] EWHC 2733 (Admin)
- Parties
- Claimant: Shropshire Council; First Defendant: Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government; Second Defendant: BDW Trading Limited trading as David Wilson Homes (Mercia); Interested Party: Magnus Charles Mowat; Interested Party: Martin John Mowat
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 02 November 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review Under Section 288 Town and Country Planning Act 1990 / High Court Judgment
- Outcome
- Claimant's application to quash granted
- Legal Topics
- Housing Land Supply, National Planning Policy Framework (nppf), Objectively Assessed Housing Need (foan), Planning Appeals, Development Plan Policies, Inspector's Duties, Adequacy of Reasons
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Shropshire Council
Claimant
Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government
First Defendant
BDW Trading Limited trading as David Wilson Homes (Mercia)
Second Defendant
Magnus Charles Mowat
Interested Party
Martin John Mowat
Interested Party
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review Under Section 288 Town and Country Planning Act 1990 / High Court Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Inspector erred in law by failing to make a judgment on the full objectively assessed needs (FOAN) and housing supply for Shropshire Council under NPPF 47 and 49
- 2 Whether the Inspector failed to engage with available evidence and provide adequate reasons for his conclusions
- 3 Whether the Inspector's approach to the balancing exercise under NPPF 14 was legally flawed
Ratio Decidendi
The Inspector erred in law by failing to make a judgment on Shropshire Council's current FOAN or housing requirements and its housing supply, as required by NPPF 47, 49, and 14, based on the evidence before him. He was required to do the best he could with available material, and if unable to do so, to provide adequate reasons. The failure to make these judgments was a critical flaw in the decision-making process, warranting quashing of the planning permission.
Court Disposition
Claimant's application to quash granted
Orders
- The decision of the Secretary of State (by the Inspector) dated 16 May 2016 is quashed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment