Oadby And Wigston Borough Council v Secretary of State for Communities And Local Government & Anor
The Inspector was entitled, as a matter of planning judgment, to adopt a figure of 147 dwellings per annum as the full objectively assessed need for housing (FOAN) for the purposes of assessing whether the Council could demonstrate a five-year housing land supply. The SHMA figures relied on by the Council were policy on, as they excluded employment-driven and affordable housing needs, and the Inspector gave adequate reasons for his approach. The Council failed to demonstrate a five-year supply even on the conservative figure adopted by the Inspector. No error of law was made.
- Parties
- Claimant: Oadby and Wigston Borough Council; First Defendant: Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government; Second Defendant: Bloor Homes Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 03 July 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review (statutory Application Under Section 288 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990) / Judgment After Hearing
- Outcome
- Claim dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Housing Land Supply, Objective Assessment of Housing Need, Affordable Housing, Development Plans, National Planning Policy Framework (nppf), Judicial Review of Planning Decisions
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Oadby and Wigston Borough Council
Claimant
Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government
First Defendant
Bloor Homes Limited
Second Defendant
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review (statutory Application Under Section 288 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990) / Judgment After Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Inspector erred in law in his assessment of the full objectively assessed need for housing (FOAN) for Oadby & Wigston Borough Council for the purposes of demonstrating a five-year housing land supply under the NPPF.
Ratio Decidendi
The Inspector was entitled, as a matter of planning judgment, to adopt a figure of 147 dwellings per annum as the full objectively assessed need for housing (FOAN) for the purposes of assessing whether the Council could demonstrate a five-year housing land supply. The SHMA figures relied on by the Council were policy on, as they excluded employment-driven and affordable housing needs, and the Inspector gave adequate reasons for his approach. The Council failed to demonstrate a five-year supply even on the conservative figure adopted by the Inspector. No error of law was made.
Court Disposition
Claim dismissed
Orders
- Application to quash the Inspector's decision refused
- No order for relief; Inspector's grant of outline planning permission stands
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment