Exeter City Council v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government & Ors [2015] EWHC 1663 (Admin) (12 June 2015)
The Inspector did not err in law in her approach to the treatment of student accommodation in the housing supply calculation. She correctly interpreted the relevant policies and guidance, considered the evidence, and was entitled to conclude that student accommodation should not be included in the housing supply in this case. The Inspector did not unlawfully adopt rigid tests for inclusion of student accommodation; her reasoning was fact-specific and consistent with the Planning Practice Guidance. Even if there had been errors, they would have been immaterial to the outcome.
- Citation
- [2015] EWHC 1663 (Admin)
- Parties
- Claimant: Exeter City Council; First Defendant: Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government; Second Defendant: Waddeton Park Limited; Third Defendant: The R B Nelder Trust
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 12 June 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Section 288 Application Under the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 / High Court Judgment
- Outcome
- Application dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Housing Supply, Student Accommodation, Development Plan, National Planning Policy Framework (nppf), Planning Practice Guidance (ppg), Judicial Review Grounds, Material Considerations, Sustainable Development
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Exeter City Council
Claimant
Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government
First Defendant
Waddeton Park Limited
Second Defendant
The R B Nelder Trust
Third Defendant
Procedural Posture
Section 288 Application Under the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 / High Court Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Inspector erred in law in relation to the treatment of student accommodation in housing supply calculations
- 2 Whether the Inspector unlawfully adopted tests for inclusion of student accommodation in housing supply
Ratio Decidendi
The Inspector did not err in law in her approach to the treatment of student accommodation in the housing supply calculation. She correctly interpreted the relevant policies and guidance, considered the evidence, and was entitled to conclude that student accommodation should not be included in the housing supply in this case. The Inspector did not unlawfully adopt rigid tests for inclusion of student accommodation; her reasoning was fact-specific and consistent with the Planning Practice Guidance. Even if there had been errors, they would have been immaterial to the outcome.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed
Orders
- Application to quash the Inspector's decision is refused
- Applications to admit further evidence are refused
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment