Johnson & Ors, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for Constitutional Affairs & Anor [2006] EWCA Civ 1808 (05 December 2006)
Permission to appeal is granted to allow both the Human Rights Act argument and the public authority argument to be heard, as both are of significant importance and may affect the applicants' rights.
- Citation
- [2006] EWCA Civ 1808
- Parties
- Claimants/appellants: Johnson & Ors; Defendants/respondents: Secretary of State for Constitutional Affairs & Anr
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 05 December 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / Renewed Application for Permission to Appeal
- Outcome
- Permission to appeal granted
- Legal Topics
- Human Rights Act 1998, Public Authority Status, Care Home Transfers, Judicial Review Procedure
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Johnson & Ors
Claimants/appellants
Secretary of State for Constitutional Affairs & Anr
Defendants/respondents
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Renewed Application for Permission to Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the transfer of care homes from public to private sector unlawfully deprives residents of human rights protection
- 2 Whether a private care home provider should be treated as a public authority under section 6(1) of the Human Rights Act 1998
Ratio Decidendi
Permission to appeal is granted to allow both the Human Rights Act argument and the public authority argument to be heard, as both are of significant importance and may affect the applicants' rights.
Court Disposition
Permission to appeal granted
Orders
- Applicants granted permission to appeal on both the Human Rights Act and public authority arguments
- Applicants granted leave to amend Notice of Appeal to include public authority argument
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment