HM Revenue & Customs v Larkstar Data Ltd
The General Commissioners misdirected themselves in law regarding the tests for control and mutuality of obligation, and made a finding of fact not supported by the evidence. Their decision cannot stand and must be set aside. The matter is remitted for rehearing by a differently constituted panel.
- Parties
- Applicant/claimant: Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs; Respondent/defendant: Larkstar Data Ltd
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 24 November 2008
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Judgment on Appeal From General Commissioners
- Outcome
- appeal allowed; decision of General Commissioners set aside; matter remitted for rehearing
- Legal Topics
- IR35 Legislation, Employment Status, Income Tax Under PAYE, Social Security Contributions, Mutuality of Obligation, Control in Employment Relationships
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs
Applicant/claimant
Larkstar Data Ltd
Respondent/defendant
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment on Appeal From General Commissioners
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the IR35 legislation applies to the arrangements between Larkstar Data Ltd and MBDA via TPS for the provision of Mr Brill's services
- 2 Whether, under a hypothetical direct contract, Mr Brill would be an employee or independent contractor of MBDA
Ratio Decidendi
The General Commissioners misdirected themselves in law regarding the tests for control and mutuality of obligation, and made a finding of fact not supported by the evidence. Their decision cannot stand and must be set aside. The matter is remitted for rehearing by a differently constituted panel.
Court Disposition
appeal allowed; decision of General Commissioners set aside; matter remitted for rehearing
Orders
- Appeal allowed with costs to the applicant, subject to detailed assessment in absence of agreement.
- Subject matter remitted to the General Commissioners for rehearing by a different panel.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment