Office of the Immigration Services Commissioner v Tony Opwa-Otto
The Tribunal found that the Prosecutor failed to prove on the balance of probabilities that Tony Opwa-Otto provided immigration advice or services to RS after February 2003, or that he acted improperly. The evidence supported that money collected was for debts assigned by TLS, and there was insufficient evidence of misconduct or breach of professional codes.
- Parties
- Prosecutor: Office of the Immigration Services Commissioner; Person Charged: Tony Opwa-Otto
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 08 May 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Disciplinary Tribunal / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Charges dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Immigration Advice, Professional Misconduct, Disciplinary Proceedings
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Office of the Immigration Services Commissioner
Prosecutor
Tony Opwa-Otto
Person Charged
Procedural Posture
Disciplinary Tribunal / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Tony Opwa-Otto provided immigration advice and services to RS after February 2003 without proper authority
- 2 Whether money collected by Tony Opwa-Otto from RS after February 2003 was for services rendered or for a debt assigned by TLS
- 3 Whether Tony Opwa-Otto acted above his level of registration
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal found that the Prosecutor failed to prove on the balance of probabilities that Tony Opwa-Otto provided immigration advice or services to RS after February 2003, or that he acted improperly. The evidence supported that money collected was for debts assigned by TLS, and there was insufficient evidence of misconduct or breach of professional codes.
Court Disposition
Charges dismissed
Orders
- All charges against Tony Opwa-Otto are dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment