Kaitey, R (On the Application Of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2021] EWCA Civ 1875 (10 December 2021)
The Secretary of State has the power to grant immigration bail under para. 1(2) of Sch. 10 to the Immigration Act 2016 even where it would be unlawful to detain the person, as 'liable to detention' refers to the existence of a legal power to detain, not its lawful exercise. The legislative history, statutory language, and transitional provisions confirm Parliament's intention to allow immigration bail in such circumstances. The regime does not inherently violate Article 5 ECHR, as the Human Rights Act provides remedies for any breach of Convention rights in individual cases.
- Citation
- [2021] EWCA Civ 1875
- Parties
- Claimant/appellant: Seth Kaitey; Defendant/respondent: Secretary of State for the Home Department; Intervener: Bail for Immigration Detainees
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 10 December 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review Appeal / Court of Appeal (civil Division) on Appeal From High Court
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Immigration Bail, Statutory Interpretation, Deprivation of Liberty, Article 5 ECHR, Transitional Provisions, Principle of Legality
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Seth Kaitey
Claimant/appellant
Secretary of State for the Home Department
Defendant/respondent
Bail for Immigration Detainees
Intervener
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review Appeal / Court of Appeal (civil Division) on Appeal From High Court
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Secretary of State has power to grant immigration bail under para. 1(2) of Sch. 10 to the Immigration Act 2016 when detention would be unlawful
- 2 Interpretation of 'liable to detention' in the context of immigration bail
- 3 Compatibility of immigration bail regime with Article 5 ECHR
Ratio Decidendi
The Secretary of State has the power to grant immigration bail under para. 1(2) of Sch. 10 to the Immigration Act 2016 even where it would be unlawful to detain the person, as 'liable to detention' refers to the existence of a legal power to detain, not its lawful exercise. The legislative history, statutory language, and transitional provisions confirm Parliament's intention to allow immigration bail in such circumstances. The regime does not inherently violate Article 5 ECHR, as the Human Rights Act provides remedies for any breach of Convention rights in individual cases.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- The appeal is dismissed; the High Court's decision is upheld.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment