Knight & Anor v AAA (EURO) Ltd & Anor [2002] EWCA Civ 758 (10 May 2002)

Knight & Anor v AAA (EURO) Ltd & Anor [2002] EWCA Civ 758 (10 May 2002)

For the BBC Charity Event, the court held that the claimants, as professionals, were asked to do work for the benefit of the defendant companies and were not asked to do so gratuitously; therefore, they were entitled to a reasonable fee of £500. For the 24 Great Marlborough Street claim, the court upheld the trial judge's finding that there was no intention to create legal relations or agreement for payment, and the claim was speculative; thus, no payment was due from the defendant companies.

Citation
[2002] EWCA Civ 758
Parties
Claimant/appellant: Allan Knight; Claimant/appellant: Julie Knight; Defendant/respondent: AAA (Euro) Ltd; Defendant/respondent: AAA (Manchester) Ltd
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
10 May 2002
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From Chancery Division to Court of Appeal
Outcome
Appeal allowed in part, dismissed in part
Legal Topics
Implied Contracts, Quantum Meruit, Intention to Create Legal Relations, Agency, Small Claims Procedure
Contract Law Civil Procedure Implied Contracts Quantum Meruit Intention to Create Legal Relations Agency Small Claims Procedure

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Allan Knight

Claimant/appellant

Julie Knight

Claimant/appellant

AAA (Euro) Ltd

Defendant/respondent

AAA (Manchester) Ltd

Defendant/respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Appeal From Chancery Division to Court of Appeal

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether claimants were entitled to payment for work done for a charity event (BBC Charity Event)
  2. 2 Whether claimants were entitled to payment for work relating to 24 Great Marlborough Street
  3. 3 Whether there was an intention to create legal relations in both claims

Ratio Decidendi

For the BBC Charity Event, the court held that the claimants, as professionals, were asked to do work for the benefit of the defendant companies and were not asked to do so gratuitously; therefore, they were entitled to a reasonable fee of £500. For the 24 Great Marlborough Street claim, the court upheld the trial judge's finding that there was no intention to create legal relations or agreement for payment, and the claim was speculative; thus, no payment was due from the defendant companies.

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed in part, dismissed in part

Orders

  • Judgment for appellants in the sum of £500 for the BBC Charity Event claim
  • Appeal dismissed regarding 24 Great Marlborough Street claim