Mackie Motors (Brechin) Limited v RCI Financial Services Limited
The pleadings did not establish a real prospect of success for the existence of an implied umbrella agreement, nor for the implication of terms overriding the express 7-day termination provision in the RCI contracts. The alleged conduct and relationship did not necessitate the implication of a contract or terms, and the estoppel and interpretation arguments failed for lack of clear representation and inconsistency with the written agreements.
- Parties
- Claimant/appellant: Mackie Motors (Brechin) Limited; Defendant/respondent: RCI Financial Services Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 11 September 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court Decision Refusing Permission to Amend Particulars of Claim and Striking Out the Claim
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Implied Contracts, Relational Contracts, Implied Terms, Good Faith, Estoppel, Interpretation of Contracts, Termination Clauses
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mackie Motors (Brechin) Limited
Claimant/appellant
RCI Financial Services Limited
Defendant/respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court Decision Refusing Permission to Amend Particulars of Claim and Striking Out the Claim
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether an umbrella or relational agreement can be implied between Mackie, RCI, Renault, and Nissan for the provision of services not covered by written contracts
- 2 Whether implied terms (including good faith and minimum notice periods) should be read into the RCI contracts or umbrella agreement
- 3 Whether the 7-day notice period in RCI contracts should be interpreted as subject to the 24-month notice in the Dealership Agreements
Ratio Decidendi
The pleadings did not establish a real prospect of success for the existence of an implied umbrella agreement, nor for the implication of terms overriding the express 7-day termination provision in the RCI contracts. The alleged conduct and relationship did not necessitate the implication of a contract or terms, and the estoppel and interpretation arguments failed for lack of clear representation and inconsistency with the written agreements.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Permission to amend Particulars of Claim refused
- Claim struck out
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment