Eastleigh Borough Council v Town Quay Developments Ltd
The Court held that, in the context of this transfer and the reservation of rights, it was necessary to imply a term that the consent of the Director of Planning and Development not be unreasonably withheld, given the commercial purpose, the conferral of power on a public officer, and the risk of frustration of the reserved rights if consent could be arbitrarily withheld.
- Parties
- Appellant/defendant: Eastleigh Borough Council; Respondent/claimant: Town Quay Developments Ltd
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 26 October 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court (chancery Division) to Court of Appeal
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Implied Terms, Withholding of Consent, Land Transfer, Easements and Reservations, Planning Law
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Eastleigh Borough Council
Appellant/defendant
Town Quay Developments Ltd
Respondent/claimant
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court (chancery Division) to Court of Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a term should be implied into a land transfer that the consent of the Director of Planning and Development to the exercise of reserved rights should not be unreasonably withheld
Ratio Decidendi
The Court held that, in the context of this transfer and the reservation of rights, it was necessary to imply a term that the consent of the Director of Planning and Development not be unreasonably withheld, given the commercial purpose, the conferral of power on a public officer, and the risk of frustration of the reserved rights if consent could be arbitrarily withheld.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- The appeal is dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment