Eastleigh Borough Council v Town Quay Developments Ltd

Eastleigh Borough Council v Town Quay Developments Ltd

The Court held that, in the context of this transfer and the reservation of rights, it was necessary to imply a term that the consent of the Director of Planning and Development not be unreasonably withheld, given the commercial purpose, the conferral of power on a public officer, and the risk of frustration of the reserved rights if consent could be arbitrarily withheld.

Parties
Appellant/defendant: Eastleigh Borough Council; Respondent/claimant: Town Quay Developments Ltd
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
26 October 2009
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court (chancery Division) to Court of Appeal
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Implied Terms, Withholding of Consent, Land Transfer, Easements and Reservations, Planning Law

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 10 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Eastleigh Borough Council

Appellant/defendant

Town Quay Developments Ltd

Respondent/claimant

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court (chancery Division) to Court of Appeal

  1. 1 Whether a term should be implied into a land transfer that the consent of the Director of Planning and Development to the exercise of reserved rights should not be unreasonably withheld

Ratio Decidendi

The Court held that, in the context of this transfer and the reservation of rights, it was necessary to imply a term that the consent of the Director of Planning and Development not be unreasonably withheld, given the commercial purpose, the conferral of power on a public officer, and the risk of frustration of the reserved rights if consent could be arbitrarily withheld.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • The appeal is dismissed.