Archer v Nubuke Investments LLP & Ors
No implied term requiring the LLP or its members to permit due diligence access to potential third-party purchasers is to be read into the LLP Agreement. The express duty of utmost good faith does not extend to facilitating such due diligence. No compliant third-party offer was made, and the valuation process was valid. Even if there had been a breach, there was no real or substantial chance that a third party would have made a compliant offer. The counterclaim for repayment of drawings fails as repayment was only out of future profits, which did not arise.
- Parties
- Claimant: Ian Archer; First Defendant: Nubuke Investments LLP; Second Defendant: Kofi Tutu Agyare; Third Defendant: Peter Kwesi Enti
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 23 October 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Civil (partnership/llp Dispute) / Judgment After Trial
- Outcome
- Claim and counterclaim dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Implied Terms, Good Faith, Valuation of Partnership Interest, Expulsion of Member, Due Diligence, Breach of Contract
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Ian Archer
Claimant
Nubuke Investments LLP
First Defendant
Kofi Tutu Agyare
Second Defendant
Peter Kwesi Enti
Third Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil (partnership/llp Dispute) / Judgment After Trial
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the LLP and its members were obliged to provide due diligence access to potential third-party purchasers under the LLP Agreement or implied terms
- 2 Whether the LLP and its members breached an express or implied duty of utmost good faith in relation to the sale of a member's interest
- 3 Whether the LLP's actions invalidated the valuation process for the claimant's interest
Ratio Decidendi
No implied term requiring the LLP or its members to permit due diligence access to potential third-party purchasers is to be read into the LLP Agreement. The express duty of utmost good faith does not extend to facilitating such due diligence. No compliant third-party offer was made, and the valuation process was valid. Even if there had been a breach, there was no real or substantial chance that a third party would have made a compliant offer. The counterclaim for repayment of drawings fails as repayment was only out of future profits, which did not arise.
Court Disposition
Claim and counterclaim dismissed
Orders
- The claims against all Defendants are dismissed.
- The counterclaim is dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment