Eastleigh Borough Council v Town Quay Developments Ltd [2009] EWCA Civ 1391 (26 October 2009)

Eastleigh Borough Council v Town Quay Developments Ltd [2009] EWCA Civ 1391 (26 October 2009)

The Court held that, despite the absence of an express term, the power to withhold consent was conferred on a public officer and, in the commercial context and circumstances of the transfer, the parties would have expected the officer to act reasonably. Therefore, a term that consent should not be unreasonably withheld was implied to give effect to the parties' intentions and business efficacy.

Citation
[2009] EWCA Civ 1391
Parties
Appellant/defendant: Eastleigh Borough Council; Respondent/claimant: Town Quay Developments Ltd
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
26 October 2009
Procedural Posture
Appeal From High Court (chancery Division) / Court of Appeal Judgment
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Implied Terms, Withholding Consent, Interpretation of Property Transfer, Business Efficacy, Planning Agreements
Property Law Contract Law Planning Law Implied Terms Withholding Consent Interpretation of Property Transfer Business Efficacy Planning Agreements

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 12 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Eastleigh Borough Council

Appellant/defendant

Town Quay Developments Ltd

Respondent/claimant

Procedural Posture

Appeal From High Court (chancery Division) / Court of Appeal Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether a term that consent is not to be unreasonably withheld should be implied in the property transfer proviso
  2. 2 Interpretation of the reservation of rights in the transfer
  3. 3 Application of business efficacy and reasonable expectations in contract interpretation

Ratio Decidendi

The Court held that, despite the absence of an express term, the power to withhold consent was conferred on a public officer and, in the commercial context and circumstances of the transfer, the parties would have expected the officer to act reasonably. Therefore, a term that consent should not be unreasonably withheld was implied to give effect to the parties' intentions and business efficacy.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • The appeal by Eastleigh Borough Council is dismissed.