Yewbelle Ltd v London Green Developments Ltd & Anor [2007] EWCA Civ 475 (23 May 2007)
The Court held that a term should be implied into the contract allowing the seller, after using all reasonable endeavours to obtain the section 106 agreement and after giving the buyer the opportunity to waive the requirement, to rescind the contract if the buyer does not waive. However, on the facts, the seller had not exhausted all reasonable endeavours, particularly in relation to the library issue, and therefore was not entitled to treat the contract as at an end.
- Citation
- [2007] EWCA Civ 475
- Parties
- Appellant Claimant: Yewbelle Limited; Respondent Defendant: London Green Developments Limited; Appellant Part 20 Defendant: Knightsbridge Green Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 23 May 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal (civil) / Court of Appeal Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Implied Terms in Contracts, Reasonable Endeavours Obligations, Specific Performance, Section 106 Agreements, Land Development Agreements
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Yewbelle Limited
Appellant Claimant
London Green Developments Limited
Respondent Defendant
Knightsbridge Green Limited
Appellant Part 20 Defendant
Procedural Posture
Appeal (civil) / Court of Appeal Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a term should be implied into the contract allowing the seller to rescind if, after using all reasonable endeavours, a section 106 agreement could not be obtained and the buyer did not waive the requirement.
- 2 Whether the seller had used all reasonable endeavours to obtain the section 106 agreement as required by the contract.
Ratio Decidendi
The Court held that a term should be implied into the contract allowing the seller, after using all reasonable endeavours to obtain the section 106 agreement and after giving the buyer the opportunity to waive the requirement, to rescind the contract if the buyer does not waive. However, on the facts, the seller had not exhausted all reasonable endeavours, particularly in relation to the library issue, and therefore was not entitled to treat the contract as at an end.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- The appeal is dismissed; the seller is not entitled to treat the contract as at an end.
- The buyer's counterclaim for specific performance may proceed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment