BW Noble Ltd v Mitchell [1927] EWCA Civ 1 (07 February 1927)

BW Noble Ltd v Mitchell [1927] EWCA Civ 1 (07 February 1927)

The control of the Paris business remained with the Board of Directors in London, making the profits assessable to UK Income Tax. The payment of £19,200 to the retiring director was made to preserve the company's reputation and facilitate the carrying on of its business, and was not capital expenditure but a deductible business expense under Rule 3 of Schedule D of the Income Tax Act, 1918.

Citation
[1927] EWCA Civ 1
Parties
Appellant/respondent (company): B. W. Noble, Limited; Respondent/appellant (director): Mitchell; Respondent/appellant: The Crown (Inland Revenue)
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
07 February 1927
Procedural Posture
Income Tax Appeal / Court of Appeal (judgment on Cross Appeals From King's Bench Division)
Outcome
Appeal by the Crown dismissed; decision of the King's Bench Division affirmed; payment allowed as a deduction; costs awarded against the Crown.
Legal Topics
Income Tax—schedule D—business Profits—control of Foreign Branch—deductibility of Compensation Payments—capital Vs Revenue Expenditure
Tax Law Company Law Income Tax—schedule D—business Profits—control of Foreign Branch—deductibility of Compensation Payments—capital Vs Revenue Expenditure

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 8 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 19
Sign in to unlock

Parties

B. W. Noble, Limited

Appellant/respondent (company)

Mitchell

Respondent/appellant (director)

The Crown (Inland Revenue)

Respondent/appellant

Procedural Posture

Income Tax Appeal / Court of Appeal (judgment on Cross Appeals From King's Bench Division)

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the profits of the Paris business were assessable to UK Income Tax under Case I of Schedule D due to control being exercised from London.
  2. 2 Whether the sum of £19,200 paid to a retiring director as part of a compromise agreement was deductible as a business expense or was capital expenditure.

Ratio Decidendi

The control of the Paris business remained with the Board of Directors in London, making the profits assessable to UK Income Tax. The payment of £19,200 to the retiring director was made to preserve the company's reputation and facilitate the carrying on of its business, and was not capital expenditure but a deductible business expense under Rule 3 of Schedule D of the Income Tax Act, 1918.

Court Disposition

Appeal by the Crown dismissed; decision of the King's Bench Division affirmed; payment allowed as a deduction; costs awarded against the Crown.

Orders

  • The sum of £19,200 paid to the retiring director is deductible as a business expense for Income Tax purposes.
  • The profits of the Paris business are assessable to UK Income Tax under Case I of Schedule D.