CFH Clearing Ltd v Merrill Lynch International
MLI's Terms, specifically clause 7, did not incorporate general market practice into the contract governing the 27 FX transactions. The ISDA Master Agreement and Confirmations prevailed, and the alleged market practice was too vague and uncertain to be contractually binding. Therefore, CFH had no real prospect of success.
- Parties
- Appellant/claimant: CFH Clearing Limited; Respondent/defendant: Merrill Lynch International
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 14 August 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From Summary Judgment in High Court
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Incorporation of Market Practice, Interpretation of Contractual Terms, Summary Judgment, Foreign Exchange Transactions
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
CFH Clearing Limited
Appellant/claimant
Merrill Lynch International
Respondent/defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From Summary Judgment in High Court
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether 'market practice' was incorporated into the contract via MLI's Terms
- 2 Whether clause 7 of MLI's Terms imposed a contractual obligation to comply with market practice
- 3 Whether the ISDA Master Agreement and Confirmations override MLI's Terms
Ratio Decidendi
MLI's Terms, specifically clause 7, did not incorporate general market practice into the contract governing the 27 FX transactions. The ISDA Master Agreement and Confirmations prevailed, and the alleged market practice was too vague and uncertain to be contractually binding. Therefore, CFH had no real prospect of success.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- CFH's claim against MLI remains dismissed
- No trial will be held on the issue of market practice incorporation
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment