Re-Source America Ltd. v Platt Site Services Ltd & Anor (No 3)

Re-Source America Ltd. v Platt Site Services Ltd & Anor (No 3)

Platt Site Services Limited is not liable to reimburse Barkin Construction Limited for sums ordered to be repaid by Re-Source America Limited, as the direct payment orders discharged Platt's obligation and entitlement, Barkin acted as principal not agent, and Platt was not a party to the damages appeal or judgment requiring repayment.

Parties
Claimant: Re-Source America Limited; Defendant and Part 20 Claimant: Platt Site Services Limited; Defendant to Part 20 Claim: Barkin Construction Limited (No 3)
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
20 October 2005
Procedural Posture
Civil / Ruling on Application for Reimbursement Following Appellate Judgment
Outcome
Application dismissed
Legal Topics
Indemnity, Direct Payment Orders, Restitution, Agency, Contribution Act 1978, Sanderson Orders

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 7 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 8
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Re-Source America Limited

Claimant

Platt Site Services Limited

Defendant and Part 20 Claimant

Barkin Construction Limited (No 3)

Defendant to Part 20 Claim

Procedural Posture

Civil / Ruling on Application for Reimbursement Following Appellate Judgment

  1. 1 Whether Platt Site Services Limited is liable to reimburse Barkin Construction Limited for sums ordered to be repaid by Re-Source America Limited after appellate reduction of damages
  2. 2 Interpretation and effect of direct payment orders and indemnity obligations
  3. 3 Whether Barkin acted as Platt's agent in making payments to Re-Source

Ratio Decidendi

Platt Site Services Limited is not liable to reimburse Barkin Construction Limited for sums ordered to be repaid by Re-Source America Limited, as the direct payment orders discharged Platt's obligation and entitlement, Barkin acted as principal not agent, and Platt was not a party to the damages appeal or judgment requiring repayment.

Court Disposition

Application dismissed