Kent v Paterson-Brown & Anor
The inherent weakness of the claim and the claimant's disproportionate approach to aspects of the litigation justified indemnity costs for part of the proceedings. The appropriate rate of interest on costs is 2.5% above base, reflecting the defendants' status as individuals. Interim payments should be set at a high proportion of the costs claimed, given the likely recovery and absence of appeal.
- Parties
- Claimant: John Kent; First Defendant: William Paterson-Brown; Second Defendant: Timothy Paterson-Brown
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 25 October 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Post Judgment Consequential Matters
- Outcome
- Claimant's claims dismissed; consequential orders on costs and payments issued.
- Legal Topics
- Indemnity Costs, Interest on Costs, Interim Payments, Assessment of Costs
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
John Kent
Claimant
William Paterson-Brown
First Defendant
Timothy Paterson-Brown
Second Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil / Post Judgment Consequential Matters
Legal Issues
- 1 Basis of assessment for first defendant's costs
- 2 Appropriate rate of interest on costs
- 3 Amount of interim payments on account of costs
Ratio Decidendi
The inherent weakness of the claim and the claimant's disproportionate approach to aspects of the litigation justified indemnity costs for part of the proceedings. The appropriate rate of interest on costs is 2.5% above base, reflecting the defendants' status as individuals. Interim payments should be set at a high proportion of the costs claimed, given the likely recovery and absence of appeal.
Court Disposition
Claimant's claims dismissed; consequential orders on costs and payments issued.
Orders
- Claimant to pay first defendant's costs on standard basis up to 27 October 2017 and indemnity basis thereafter.
- Claimant to pay interest on defendants' costs at 2.5% above base per annum up to 30 July 2018.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment