Lloyd v Svenby
Mr Lloyd must pay 80 per cent of Mr Svenby's costs, assessed on an indemnity basis, due to the failure of his claim, the aggressive and unfounded nature of his allegations, rejection of a reasonable settlement offer, and the disproportionate costs incurred.
- Parties
- Claimant: Allen John Lloyd; First Defendant: Staffan Svenby; Second Defendant: The Secretary of State for Transport
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 21 March 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Costs Judgment Following Dismissal of Claim and Counterclaim
- Outcome
- Costs judgment; claimant to pay 80% of first defendant's costs on indemnity basis, with interest and interim payment.
- Legal Topics
- Indemnity Costs, Interest on Costs, Settlement Offers, Malicious Falsehood, Injunctive Relief
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Allen John Lloyd
Claimant
Staffan Svenby
First Defendant
The Secretary of State for Transport
Second Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil / Costs Judgment Following Dismissal of Claim and Counterclaim
Legal Issues
- 1 Who should bear the costs of proceedings after dismissal of claim and counterclaim
- 2 Whether costs should be assessed on an indemnity basis
- 3 Impact of late amendment to plead non-justiciability
Ratio Decidendi
Mr Lloyd must pay 80 per cent of Mr Svenby's costs, assessed on an indemnity basis, due to the failure of his claim, the aggressive and unfounded nature of his allegations, rejection of a reasonable settlement offer, and the disproportionate costs incurred.
Court Disposition
Costs judgment; claimant to pay 80% of first defendant's costs on indemnity basis, with interest and interim payment.
Orders
- Mr Lloyd to pay 80% of Mr Svenby's costs, assessed on an indemnity basis, subject to the order on the second inspection.
- Mr Lloyd to pay interest at 1% over base rate from the date of payment by Mr Svenby of each of his solicitors’ bills on 80% of the amount so paid.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment