Scottish & Newcastle Plc v Raguz
Section 17 of the 1995 Act requires landlords to serve protective notices within 6 months of each rent day to preserve claims against former tenants for rent arrears, including those arising from rent reviews. However, the indemnity under section 24(1)(b) of the 1925 Act is not limited to payments the assignor was legally compellable to make; it extends to all expenses or claims fairly and reasonably incurred as a result of the assignee’s default, including payments made to facilitate assignment and mitigate future exposure, even if the claimant prompted the landlord to serve section 17 notices.
- Parties
- Claimant/respondent: Scottish & Newcastle plc; Defendant/appellant: Zeljko Stephen Raguz
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 06 March 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Judgment on Appeal From High Court
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed; Respondent’s Notice dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Indemnity Under Lease Assignments, Effect of Landlord and Tenant (covenants) Act 1995, Section 17 Notice Requirements, Implied Indemnity Covenants, Rent Review Provisions
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Scottish & Newcastle plc
Claimant/respondent
Zeljko Stephen Raguz
Defendant/appellant
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Judgment on Appeal From High Court
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether section 17(2) notice under the Landlord and Tenant (Covenants) Act 1995 must be served within 6 months of each rent day to preserve liability of original tenant for reviewed rent
- 2 Whether the indemnity under section 24(1)(b) of the Land Registration Act 1925 covers payments made by the original tenant to the landlord even if not legally compellable
- 3 Whether the claimant can recover under the indemnity for sums paid after prompting the landlord to serve section 17 notices
Ratio Decidendi
Section 17 of the 1995 Act requires landlords to serve protective notices within 6 months of each rent day to preserve claims against former tenants for rent arrears, including those arising from rent reviews. However, the indemnity under section 24(1)(b) of the 1925 Act is not limited to payments the assignor was legally compellable to make; it extends to all expenses or claims fairly and reasonably incurred as a result of the assignee’s default, including payments made to facilitate assignment and mitigate future exposure, even if the claimant prompted the landlord to serve section 17 notices.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed; Respondent’s Notice dismissed
Orders
- The appeal by the defendant is dismissed.
- The Respondent’s Notice is dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment