Welburn v Dibb Lupton Broomhead [2002] EWCA Civ 1601 (24 October 2002)
The IVA created a trust of Mr Welburn's assets, including the claim against SCL, for the benefit of creditors, with the supervisor as trustee. Mr Welburn retained only bare legal title and no beneficial interest. Therefore, any loss from failure to recover from SCL was suffered by the creditors, not Mr Welburn, and he could not recover such losses. The judge was entitled to strike out the claim for loss of opportunity to resume business due to failure to provide particulars despite court orders.
- Citation
- [2002] EWCA Civ 1601
- Parties
- Claimant/appellant: Clive Welburn; Defendant/respondent: Dibb Lupton Broomhead
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 24 October 2002
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court (technology and Construction Court) to Court of Appeal
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Individual Voluntary Arrangement (iva), Equitable Assignment, Trusts Arising From Insolvency Arrangements, Solicitor's Negligence, Assessment of Damages, Beneficial Ownership of Claims
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Clive Welburn
Claimant/appellant
Dibb Lupton Broomhead
Defendant/respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court (technology and Construction Court) to Court of Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the IVA created a trust of the claim against SCL for the benefit of creditors
- 2 Whether losses claimed by Mr Welburn were recoverable by him or only by the creditors under the IVA
- 3 Whether the judge was correct to strike out the claim for loss of opportunity to resume business
Ratio Decidendi
The IVA created a trust of Mr Welburn's assets, including the claim against SCL, for the benefit of creditors, with the supervisor as trustee. Mr Welburn retained only bare legal title and no beneficial interest. Therefore, any loss from failure to recover from SCL was suffered by the creditors, not Mr Welburn, and he could not recover such losses. The judge was entitled to strike out the claim for loss of opportunity to resume business due to failure to provide particulars despite court orders.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Appeal dismissed with costs
- Usual order for costs against the Legal Services Commission
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment