Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha Ltd v James Kemball Ltd

Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha Ltd v James Kemball Ltd

JKL's claim, as pleaded and as proposed to be amended, does not have a real prospect of success because there is no evidential basis for inducement, encouragement, or persuasion by KKK; K-Euro had no choice but to breach due to the joint venture, and KKK's conduct was not causative participation. The intention element is not met as the breach was not an end or means to an end for KKK, but merely a consequence of lawful restructuring. The appeal is allowed and permission to serve out is set aside.

Parties
Appellant/second Defendant: Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha Ltd; Respondent/claimant: James Kemball Limited
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
18 January 2021
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court Decision on Application to Set Aside Order Granting Permission to Serve Claim Out of Jurisdiction
Outcome
Appeal allowed
Legal Topics
Inducing Breach of Contract, Accessory Liability, Intention in Tort, Causation in Tort, Corporate Restructuring
Tort Law Contract Law Commercial Law Inducing Breach of Contract Accessory Liability Intention in Tort Causation in Tort Corporate Restructuring

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 19 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha Ltd

Appellant/second Defendant

James Kemball Limited

Respondent/claimant

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court Decision on Application to Set Aside Order Granting Permission to Serve Claim Out of Jurisdiction

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the pleaded or proposed amended case for inducing breach of contract against KKK has a real prospect of success
  2. 2 Whether the elements of inducement, intention, and causation are sufficiently pleaded and supported by evidence

Ratio Decidendi

JKL's claim, as pleaded and as proposed to be amended, does not have a real prospect of success because there is no evidential basis for inducement, encouragement, or persuasion by KKK; K-Euro had no choice but to breach due to the joint venture, and KKK's conduct was not causative participation. The intention element is not met as the breach was not an end or means to an end for KKK, but merely a consequence of lawful restructuring. The appeal is allowed and permission to serve out is set aside.

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed

Orders

  • Order granting permission to serve the claim on KKK out of the jurisdiction is set aside