Garland v Morris & Anor

Garland v Morris & Anor

The claimant failed to establish that it was unreasonable for her father to make no provision for her, given the estrangement, prior benefit from her mother's estate, and the reasonable claims of the second defendant and her family. The financial need of the claimant was outweighed by these factors.

Parties
Claimant: Yvette Hilary Garland; First Defendant: Arnold Brian Morris; Second Defendant: Beverly Joy Moore
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
11 January 2007
Procedural Posture
Claim Under Inheritance (provision for Family and Dependants) Act 1975 / Judgment
Outcome
Claim dismissed
Legal Topics
Inheritance, Provision for Dependants, Testamentary Dispositions, Adult Child Claims

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 15 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 13
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Yvette Hilary Garland

Claimant

Arnold Brian Morris

First Defendant

Beverly Joy Moore

Second Defendant

Procedural Posture

Claim Under Inheritance (provision for Family and Dependants) Act 1975 / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the will and codicil of Cuthbert Peter Garland failed to make reasonable provision for the claimant under section 1 of the Act
  2. 2 Whether the estrangement between the claimant and the deceased affected the claimant's entitlement
  3. 3 Whether the claimant's financial need justified provision from the estate

Ratio Decidendi

The claimant failed to establish that it was unreasonable for her father to make no provision for her, given the estrangement, prior benefit from her mother's estate, and the reasonable claims of the second defendant and her family. The financial need of the claimant was outweighed by these factors.

Court Disposition

Claim dismissed