Kaur v Dhaliwal & Anor [2014] EWHC 1991 (Ch) (17 June 2014)
The judge was entitled to find that the qualifying relationship endured throughout the relevant period, as the interruption in living under the same roof was transitory and did not amount to an irretrievable breakdown; thus, the statutory criteria were satisfied.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2014] EWHC 1991 (Ch)
- Parties
- Respondent/claimant: Harjinder Kaur; Appellant/defendant: Sandeep Singh Dhaliwal; Appellant/defendant: Amitoz Singh Dhaliwal
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 17 June 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Judgment on Appeal From County Court Decision on Preliminary Issue
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Inheritance (provision for Family and Dependants) Act 1975, Cohabitation, Statutory Interpretation, Provision for Dependants
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Harjinder Kaur
Respondent/claimant
Sandeep Singh Dhaliwal
Appellant/defendant
Amitoz Singh Dhaliwal
Appellant/defendant
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment on Appeal From County Court Decision on Preliminary Issue
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Claimant satisfied the statutory criteria under section 1(1A) of the Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependants) Act 1975 for being treated as living in the same household as the deceased as his wife for the two years immediately prior to death
Ratio Decidendi
The judge was entitled to find that the qualifying relationship endured throughout the relevant period, as the interruption in living under the same roof was transitory and did not amount to an irretrievable breakdown; thus, the statutory criteria were satisfied.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- The appeal is dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment