Routier & Anor v The Commissioners for HMRC
Jersey is to be treated as a third country for the purposes of Article 56 EC. HMRC is entitled to refuse inheritance tax relief on gifts to non-UK charities unless there is a mutual assistance agreement between the UK and the country in which the charity is based. The restriction in IHTA s 23 is justified under EU law on grounds of effective fiscal supervision. IHTA s 23 can be interpreted in conformity with EU law to permit relief only where there is such an agreement. The appeal is dismissed.
- Parties
- Appellants: Routier & Anr; Respondents: The Commissioners for HM Revenue and Customs; Intervener: Attorney General for Jersey (Intervener)
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 17 October 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment on Appeal From High Court
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Inheritance Tax, Freedom of Movement of Capital, Charitable Relief, Mutual Assistance Agreements, Interpretation of Statutes
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Routier & Anr
Appellants
The Commissioners for HM Revenue and Customs
Respondents
Attorney General for Jersey (Intervener)
Intervener
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment on Appeal From High Court
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Jersey is a third country for the purposes of Article 56 EC (now Article 63 TFEU) on freedom of movement of capital
- 2 Whether the restriction in IHTA s 23 is justified under EU law on grounds of effective fiscal supervision (EFS)
- 3 Whether IHTA s 23 can be interpreted in conformity with EU law
Ratio Decidendi
Jersey is to be treated as a third country for the purposes of Article 56 EC. HMRC is entitled to refuse inheritance tax relief on gifts to non-UK charities unless there is a mutual assistance agreement between the UK and the country in which the charity is based. The restriction in IHTA s 23 is justified under EU law on grounds of effective fiscal supervision. IHTA s 23 can be interpreted in conformity with EU law to permit relief only where there is such an agreement. The appeal is dismissed.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Appeal dismissed; HMRC's determination stands; no relief from inheritance tax for the gift to the Jersey charity in absence of a mutual assistance agreement.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment