Funky Brownz 2 Ltd v Vithlani [2017] EWHC 3644 (Ch) (21 November 2017)
The applicant failed to provide sufficient evidence to demonstrate a genuine dispute as to the debt claimed by the respondent. The inconsistencies and lack of documentary support in the applicant's case meant the threshold for granting an injunction was not met.
- Citation
- [2017] EWHC 3644 (Ch)
- Parties
- Claimant/applicant: Funky Brownz 2 Ltd; Defendant/respondent: Jitesh Vithlani
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 21 November 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Injunction Application (insolvency) / Judgment on Application for Injunction to Restrain Presentation of Winding Up Petition
- Outcome
- Application dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Injunctions, Winding Up Petitions, Statutory Demand, Debt Disputes
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Funky Brownz 2 Ltd
Claimant/applicant
Jitesh Vithlani
Defendant/respondent
Procedural Posture
Injunction Application (insolvency) / Judgment on Application for Injunction to Restrain Presentation of Winding Up Petition
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant company has demonstrated a sufficient dispute as to the debt to justify an injunction restraining the presentation of a winding up petition
Ratio Decidendi
The applicant failed to provide sufficient evidence to demonstrate a genuine dispute as to the debt claimed by the respondent. The inconsistencies and lack of documentary support in the applicant's case meant the threshold for granting an injunction was not met.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed
Orders
- Application for injunction restraining presentation of winding up petition is dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment