South Cambridgeshire District Council v Gammell & Ors
The proportionality and balancing exercise required by South Bucks District Council v Porter does not apply to persons who become defendants by acting in breach of an injunction granted against persons unknown after the injunction is made. Such persons are in contempt if they knowingly breach the injunction, and their personal circumstances are only relevant at the sentencing stage or upon an application to vary or discharge the injunction.
- Parties
- Claimant/respondent: South Cambridgeshire District Council; Defendants/appellants: Gammell and Others; Claimant/respondent: The Mayor and Burgesses of the London Borough of Bromley; Defendants/appellants: Winnie Maughan and Others
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 31 October 2005
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From Committal Orders for Contempt of Court
- Outcome
- Appeals dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Injunctions Against Persons Unknown, Contempt of Court, Article 8 ECHR (right to Respect for Private and Family Life), Proportionality in Injunctive Relief, Variation and Discharge of Injunctions
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
South Cambridgeshire District Council
Claimant/respondent
Gammell and Others
Defendants/appellants
The Mayor and Burgesses of the London Borough of Bromley
Claimant/respondent
Winnie Maughan and Others
Defendants/appellants
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From Committal Orders for Contempt of Court
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the proportionality balancing exercise from South Bucks District Council v Porter applies to persons who become defendants after an injunction is granted against persons unknown
- 2 Whether personal circumstances must be considered before finding contempt for breach of such injunctions
Ratio Decidendi
The proportionality and balancing exercise required by South Bucks District Council v Porter does not apply to persons who become defendants by acting in breach of an injunction granted against persons unknown after the injunction is made. Such persons are in contempt if they knowingly breach the injunction, and their personal circumstances are only relevant at the sentencing stage or upon an application to vary or discharge the injunction.
Court Disposition
Appeals dismissed
Orders
- Appeal of Kathleen Gammell dismissed; sentencing to proceed with consideration of personal circumstances at sentencing stage.
- Appeal of Winnie Maughan dismissed; committal order suspended for two months to allow removal of caravans.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment