Rochdale Metropolitan Borough Council v Shane Heron & Ors
There is a compelling need for injunctive relief to restrain unauthorised encampments and associated harms, alternative remedies are ineffective, procedural and substantive requirements for injunctions against persons unknown are satisfied, and the orders are proportionate and time-limited.
- Parties
- Claimant: Rochdale Metropolitan Borough Council; Defendants: Shane Heron & Ors
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 27 June 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Injunctive Relief / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Injunctions granted
- Legal Topics
- Injunctions Against Unauthorised Encampments, Persons Unknown Injunctions, Local Authority Powers, Planning Control Enforcement, Quia Timet (precautionary) Relief
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Rochdale Metropolitan Borough Council
Claimant
Shane Heron & Ors
Defendants
Procedural Posture
Civil Injunctive Relief / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a final injunction should be granted against named Defendants and persons unknown to restrain unauthorised encampments and depositing of controlled waste
- 2 Whether the requirements for granting an injunction against persons unknown as set out in Wolverhampton are met
- 3 Whether procedural protections and proportionality requirements are satisfied for such injunctions
Ratio Decidendi
There is a compelling need for injunctive relief to restrain unauthorised encampments and associated harms, alternative remedies are ineffective, procedural and substantive requirements for injunctions against persons unknown are satisfied, and the orders are proportionate and time-limited.
Court Disposition
Injunctions granted
Orders
- A five-year injunction order against the remaining Named Defendants in substantially the same terms as the interim injunction order.
- A one-year injunction order against Persons Unknown in substantially the same terms as the interim injunction order, limited to 334 specified sites.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment