Canning v Northhampton County Coroner [2006] EWCA Civ 513 (23 March 2006)
There is sufficient prospect of success on appeal that the coroner may have erred in refusing to hold an inquest, particularly in light of possible systemic failures and Article 2 ECHR obligations, to justify granting permission to appeal.
- Citation
- [2006] EWCA Civ 513
- Parties
- Claimant/applicant: Adam Wilkie Canning; Defendant/respondent: HM Coroner for the County of Northampton
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 23 March 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Application for Permission to Appeal From Divisional Court Decision
- Outcome
- Permission to appeal granted.
- Legal Topics
- Inquests, Article 2 ECHR, Standard for Holding Inquest, Systemic Failure in Care, Natural Vs Unnatural Death
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Adam Wilkie Canning
Claimant/applicant
HM Coroner for the County of Northampton
Defendant/respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Application for Permission to Appeal From Divisional Court Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the coroner erred in refusing to hold an inquest into the death of Francis Canning
- 2 Whether there was a prima facie case of culpable human failure or systemic failure requiring an inquest under section 8(1) of the Coroner's Act 1988
- 3 Whether Article 2 of the Human Rights Convention was breached by not holding an inquest
Ratio Decidendi
There is sufficient prospect of success on appeal that the coroner may have erred in refusing to hold an inquest, particularly in light of possible systemic failures and Article 2 ECHR obligations, to justify granting permission to appeal.
Court Disposition
Permission to appeal granted.
Orders
- Permission to appeal granted.
- Application to rely on further evidence adjourned for consideration by the full court.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment