Viackiene v London Borough of Tower Hamlets [2013] EWCA Civ 1764 (11 December 2013)
The reviewing officer was entitled to conclude that the appellant's deliberate refusal to accept the landlord's offer to help find a new co-tenant, and failure to take reasonable steps to address the rent arrears, amounted to intentional conduct resulting in homelessness under section 191(1) of the Housing Act 1996.
- Citation
- [2013] EWCA Civ 1764
- Parties
- Claimant/appellant: Anzela Viackiene; Defendant/respondent: The London Borough of Tower Hamlets
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 11 December 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal (housing) / Court of Appeal Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Intentional Homelessness, Statutory Interpretation, Review of Local Authority Decisions
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Anzela Viackiene
Claimant/appellant
The London Borough of Tower Hamlets
Defendant/respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal (housing) / Court of Appeal Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the appellant was intentionally homeless under section 191(1) of the Housing Act 1996
- 2 Whether the reviewing officer took into account irrelevant considerations
- 3 Whether adequate reasons were provided for the decision
Ratio Decidendi
The reviewing officer was entitled to conclude that the appellant's deliberate refusal to accept the landlord's offer to help find a new co-tenant, and failure to take reasonable steps to address the rent arrears, amounted to intentional conduct resulting in homelessness under section 191(1) of the Housing Act 1996.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment