Rowley v Rugby Borough Council [2006] EWCA Civ 1755 (23 November 2006)
There are arguable points that the local authority may have failed to comply with procedural requirements under regulation 8(2) and may not have afforded the appellant procedural fairness, warranting permission to appeal.
- Citation
- [2006] EWCA Civ 1755
- Parties
- Claimant/appellant: Rowley; Defendant/respondent: Rugby Borough Council
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 23 November 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Application for Permission to Appeal (renewed Application)
- Outcome
- Permission to appeal granted
- Legal Topics
- Intentional Homelessness, Homelessness Review Procedures, Procedural Fairness, Housing Act 1996, Allocation of Housing and Homelessness (review Procedures) Regulations 1999
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Rowley
Claimant/appellant
Rugby Borough Council
Defendant/respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Application for Permission to Appeal (renewed Application)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the local authority erred in finding the appellant intentionally homeless
- 2 Whether the review procedure under regulation 8(2) was properly followed
- 3 Whether procedural fairness was afforded to the appellant in the review process
Ratio Decidendi
There are arguable points that the local authority may have failed to comply with procedural requirements under regulation 8(2) and may not have afforded the appellant procedural fairness, warranting permission to appeal.
Court Disposition
Permission to appeal granted
Orders
- Application for permission to appeal is granted
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment