Lake v Hunt Kid Law Firm LLP
Article 14 of the Solicitors' (Non-Contentious Business) Remuneration Order 1994 does not confer discretion on the court to reduce or disallow interest claimed by a solicitor in accordance with its provisions; section 35(A) Senior Courts Act 1981 does not apply to costs assessment proceedings and does not permit reduction or disallowance of interest; the respondent is entitled to interest at the rate and for the period specified in the 1994 Order.
- Parties
- Claimant/appellant: Thomas Lake; Defendant/respondent: Hunt Kid Law Firm LLP (in Administration)
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 30 March 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Interest on Costs, Detailed Assessment, Solicitors (non Contentious Business) Remuneration Order 1994, Section 35(a) Senior Courts Act 1981
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Thomas Lake
Claimant/appellant
Hunt Kid Law Firm LLP (in Administration)
Defendant/respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Article 14 of the Solicitors' (Non-Contentious Business) Remuneration Order 1994 confers discretion on the court to reduce or disallow interest claimed by a solicitor
- 2 Whether section 35(A) Senior Courts Act 1981 permits reduction or disallowance of interest in costs assessment proceedings
- 3 Whether interest should be awarded to the appellant on costs awarded
Ratio Decidendi
Article 14 of the Solicitors' (Non-Contentious Business) Remuneration Order 1994 does not confer discretion on the court to reduce or disallow interest claimed by a solicitor in accordance with its provisions; section 35(A) Senior Courts Act 1981 does not apply to costs assessment proceedings and does not permit reduction or disallowance of interest; the respondent is entitled to interest at the rate and for the period specified in the 1994 Order.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Respondent entitled to interest as assessed by Costs Judge
- Parties to file written submissions on costs by 4.00pm 1 April 2011
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment