Buckinghamshire County Council v Sweeney & Ors [2020] EWHC 1811 (QB) (11 June 2020)
The claimant demonstrated a serious issue to be tried regarding breaches of planning control, damages are not an adequate remedy as the local authority acts in the public interest, and the balance of convenience favours maintaining the status quo and preventing further unlawful development; therefore, an interim injunction is granted.
- Citation
- [2020] EWHC 1811
- Parties
- Claimant: Buckinghamshire County Council; First Defendant: James Joseph Sweeney; Second Defendant: Persons Unknown
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 11 June 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Injunction Application Under Section 187 B Town and Country Planning Act 1990 / Return Date Hearing for Interim Injunction
- Outcome
- Interim injunction granted
- Legal Topics
- Interim Injunctions, Breach of Planning Control, Section 187 B TCPA 1990, Temporary Stop Notice, Balance of Convenience
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Buckinghamshire County Council
Claimant
James Joseph Sweeney
First Defendant
Persons Unknown
Second Defendant
Procedural Posture
Injunction Application Under Section 187 B Town and Country Planning Act 1990 / Return Date Hearing for Interim Injunction
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether an interim injunction should be granted to restrain actual and apprehended breaches of planning control under section 187B TCPA 1990
- 2 Whether the balance of convenience favours granting the injunction
- 3 Whether damages are an adequate remedy
Ratio Decidendi
The claimant demonstrated a serious issue to be tried regarding breaches of planning control, damages are not an adequate remedy as the local authority acts in the public interest, and the balance of convenience favours maintaining the status quo and preventing further unlawful development; therefore, an interim injunction is granted.
Court Disposition
Interim injunction granted
Orders
- Defendants are restrained from carrying out further development or change of use on the land without planning permission.
- Liberty to apply provision included for variation or discharge of the order.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment