ABK v KDT & Anor [2013] EWHC 1192 (QB) (13 May 2013)

ABK v KDT & Anor [2013] EWHC 1192 (QB) (13 May 2013)

The court found that the claimant was more likely than not to establish entitlement to protection of her private information and that the defendants' conduct constituted harassment, justifying continuation of the interim non disclosure order.

Citation
[2013] EWHC 1192
Parties
Claimant: ABK; First Defendant: KDT; Second Defendant: FGH
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
13 May 2013
Procedural Posture
Civil / Interim Order Hearing
Outcome
Interim non disclosure order continued
Legal Topics
Interim Non Disclosure Orders, Confidentiality, Service of Documents
Privacy Harassment Civil Procedure Interim Non Disclosure Orders Confidentiality Service of Documents

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

ABK

Claimant

KDT

First Defendant

FGH

Second Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil / Interim Order Hearing

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether disclosure of private photographs and information should be restrained
  2. 2 Whether conduct of defendants amounts to harassment

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the claimant was more likely than not to establish entitlement to protection of her private information and that the defendants' conduct constituted harassment, justifying continuation of the interim non disclosure order.

Court Disposition

Interim non disclosure order continued

Orders

  • Defendants restrained from disclosing claimant's private photographs and information
  • Defendants restrained from harassing claimant through communications or attempts to meet