Spillman v Bradfield Riding Centre [2007] EWHC 89 (QB) (06 February 2007)
The court held that a reasonable proportion of the likely amount of the final judgment (70% of £260,000, i.e. £182,000) was 75%, resulting in £136,500, from which previous payments (£80,000) were deducted, leaving a further interim payment of £56,500 to be ordered.
- Citation
- [2007] EWHC 89 (QB)
- Parties
- Appellant/claimant: Jade Spillman; Respondent/defendant: Bradfield Riding Centre
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 06 February 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Personal Injury Appeal / Appeal From Interim Payment Order
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Interim Payments, Assessment of Damages, Court of Protection, Disability Claims
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Jade Spillman
Appellant/claimant
Bradfield Riding Centre
Respondent/defendant
Procedural Posture
Personal Injury Appeal / Appeal From Interim Payment Order
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Master erred in refusing the interim payment sought by the claimant
- 2 What is a reasonable proportion of the likely amount of the final judgment for interim payment purposes under CPR 25.7(4)
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that a reasonable proportion of the likely amount of the final judgment (70% of £260,000, i.e. £182,000) was 75%, resulting in £136,500, from which previous payments (£80,000) were deducted, leaving a further interim payment of £56,500 to be ordered.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed
Orders
- A further interim payment of £56,500 to the claimant
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment